An intriguing industrial chassis there. I was going to comment on the point of the compensated axles when the coupling rods were solid but then realised that the centre wheels are just free wheeling, but then bolted in hornblock plates!The model runs as an 0-4-0, this makes the side rods much easier with such a short wheelbase. The driven axle is rigid and the other two are compensated around a central rocking arm. The compensated axles are supported in home-made hornblocks.
The model runs as an 0-4-0, this makes the side rods much easier with such a short wheelbase.
Now that first image is just so good, I cannot make my mind up if the single bolster sets off the tram or Toby enhances the wagon.
Nice!
There is room to put some lead inside the model and I am sure this would increase its hauling capacity, but six wagons is more than enough at home so I expect I will leave well alone.
Whilst Ian’s comment above makes perfect sense, I tend to a different criterion, the sine qua non is that the loco should not be so weighted that it cannot always spin its wheels at max throttle when driven up to the buffers., or something similarly immobile.
This probably matters more for DCC fitted locos where the decoder will ramp up the power to try to maintain speed, than for DC where the hand tends to be on the throttle.
You don’t directly say, but I’m presuming from your comments the issue is slipping? So not lack of power, lack of adhesion.Returning home I have discovered the loco can propel barely 1.5 times its own weight on level track. I suggest, the chassis compensation is placing a chunk of the locomotive's weight onto the unpowered central axle where it does nothing useful. The chassis would produce more traction if the leading axle rocked and the centre axle was lightly sprung. This would put more of the weight of the model onto the two driven axles.
Ahem! The head office of the Heybridge and Langford Light Railway was within the campus of E H Bentall, a successful engineering company. There is nothing in the factual background nor the fictional history of the railway to imply anything decrepit about its infrastructure. Only the internal-user wagons were superannuated. Remember, the GER ran thorugh trains over the line.
Nevertheless, the EHBrail (capitalisation still uncertain) franchise is of great interest; a major success story of British railway privatisation. By the 1980s, the timber viaducts at Wickham Bishops were in a very poor state of repair. The residents of Heybridge were delighted with their new bypass but the residents of Langford were most definitely not. EH Bentall continued to prosper but the winding B1018/9 was inadequate for the UK part of their European logistics operations. Private capital funded the removal of the timber viaducts and their reinstatement at the East Anglian Railway Museum; also construction of new embankments and a modern railway bridge in their place. The new Witham to Heybridge railway operation, known as Heybridge Railway(1984) Limited, provided a direct rail link from Heybridge to Witham and, through the reinstated north-facing chord line, to Felixstowe and Harwich. This strictly freight-only operation continued to prosper after the opening of the Channel Tunnel and the loss of the Harwich train ferry service. Indeed, we can expect to see this unique train waiting in the loop at Beaulieu Park sometime next year, taking a brief pause on its journey to Dollands Moor.
So be careful what you wish for. I have a Class 66 apparently on hire from GBRf, a class 11 from Harry Needle and some smaller "terminal pilot" traction to hand. A project just needs a repaint on two or three bogie ferry wagons, and even more tolerance from our congregation![]()
EasyJet? British Airways?I casually ran an airline over Heybridge Basin...