I think there were some construction articles before that, Paul. Its first show was ‘89 at Warley and it’s been unfinished ever since…
Yes it was. There were some beautiful buildings, obviously made by Ray. The baseboards are fantastic (made by Mike Randall), and are the same box-beam design as CF. It would not have been my choice of prototype.Hill End, was that the layout based on the old St Albans to Hatield line?
Tony
Tim,Our first show to demonstrate the layout concept was at the last IMREX at the Wembley Conference Centre (probably 1985). We were on the balcony, showing Bill Blackburn’s impressive track making jigs and other display bits, such as the model of the model.
View attachment 184842
During the show an elderly gentleman and his son enquired on the stand, “Why don’t you use the new PECO track?” I replied that this layout was going to be 2mm finescale and that it would be incompatible. He responded “I’m sure you could get a good deal”. Again I said that it was incompatible with the wheel standards, asking him who he was. “Sidney Pritchard”. He walked off muttering to Michael…
Interesting how things turn out isn’t it? We certainly didn’t expect to still be working on it nearly 40 years on.
Tim
Mr freezers comment might reflect the old ideology of shoving as much track on a baseboard as possible. I'm very glad layouts like CF and others have pioneered placing the railway as part of a proper scene and added track with restraint.didn’t have enough railway in it.
How I agree with you. The MRC have a good track record (!) for getting railway and scenics in proper proportion. In my formative years as a model builder I remember an MRC layout - Chiltern Green I think it was called but Tim will doubtless put me right - which was also 2mm and was landscape - very largely all landscape - with a railway line running through it pretty much on the horizon and a branch coming towards the front. I very much agree that there is a tendency to cram in as much track as possible and that's up to the individual but the really effective exhibition layouts for me are those which show the railway in a believable environment. However, if you're operating your own railway on a daily basis I'm sure that would become tedious and (in ignorance as I don't have a layout) I can understand the need to entertain as many operating scenarios as possible - hence more track.Mr freezers comment might reflect the old ideology of shoving as much track on a baseboard as possible. I'm very glad layouts like CF and others have pioneered placing the railway as part of a proper scene and added track with restraint.
I find with every layout I draw I then have to at least remove a siding or a platform because I've over egged it and left not enough room for the scenery.
How did you go about achieving that Ballance on CF?
From a youngster, Pendon had a huge influence on what appealed to me in a railway. That and an uncle who was a good artist who got me to paint backscenes on my train sets. Later on, Ivy Bevis-Smith took that to another level on the S gauge layout ‘Thame & Bledlow’. This indirectly led to a particularly threatening sky on my original N gauge layout ‘Gouldby for Caldecote’ (it appeared in the last issue of Model Railways edited by Roy Dock). I think the Pendon Vale Scene is magnificent but I find the layout of the village buildings implausible, wonderful models that the cottages are in their own right. They could also have used a bit of reduced scale in the distant parts of the big scene.IMHO Pendon does railways in the landscape rather splendidly as well
Later on, Ivy Bevis-Smith took that to another level on the S gauge layout ‘Thame & Bledlow’.