I couldn't really follow that. I just tend to work on the net prices with my VAT added on at the end and it annoys the hell out of me if my suppliers are not VAT reg as [see my earlier posting] they are still passing their VAT onto me as they cannot claim it back.
My calculation might be -
Input cost £100 - sell it for £250 [not my mark up!] + VAT - and whatever it comes out to is whatever it comes out to - I would not let the VAT factor impact upon the mark up I wanted to make.
Also, don't you also need to factor in all the other things you can claim VAT back on like tools & modelling equipment, computers & equipment, printing costs and so many other things - moulds, photo-tools and so much more, right down to things like courier fees.
Regards,
David
David - it was merely a very simple way of showing that for a simple operation which essentially buys in components and services (e.g. boxes and courier fees) and sells same as kits, then UNLESS YOU INCREASE THE SELLING PRICE you cannot generate the same profit if registered for VAT.
Of course, like Steve Cook you
could try to reclaim
two lots of input VAT - but HMRC will catch up with you eventually and you'll eventually have to pay it all back plus maybe a fine
).
The other things you suggest should be factored in are surely additional direct costs (like components or boxes or instruction sheets or courier services), or overheads / production equipment which need to be apportioned somehow - but I have already agreed with you that this is where being registered for VAT can become advantageous.
I hereby resgn as self-appointed VAT Consultant to the new consortium.
Can I drive the Delivery Van instead please?