Fordwich Arms

Willl

Western Thunderer
It's been a few months since I've posted anything here regarding Fordwich. To be honest, once the initial excitement wore off, progress with the layout/diorama slowed pretty much immediately and I moved on to other projects (primarily finishing Rye Sands, but also dabbling in some N gauge). I had a few reservations with the idea which took the wind out of my sails:
  • I wasn't particularly keen on the idea of 'competing', given how personal and subjective modelling is.
  • I also wasn't big on the idea of shipping one of my layouts across the country, and the lack of clarity over what Peco plans to do with the layouts (should they make it to the final) was not confidence inspiring.
  • The dimensional restrictions precluded making the layout as a 'cameo', which is very much my preferred approach at this point.
  • The layout has until this point been a pure diorama, with no fiddle yard. Although I enjoy modelling, I struggle to maintain enthusiasm for layouts which I can't actually run trains on!
After a fair amount of thinking, I've come to the conclusion that there is no point me pushing on with the build in it's current form. However, I still like the basic idea of a rural river port, with the ramshackle crane house and medieval bridge, and having completed the former and made significant progress on the latter I am keen to find a them a home.

I have done more plotting than is probably healthy in recent months, coming up with umpteen layout plans, but on reflection my circumstances best favour small, self-contained cameo layouts (I also have a pretty much complete design, backstory, and operational plan for a larger KESR/SECR junction called Benenden Road, but I think I'll hold fire on that for now). With that in mind, I have made a revised plan for a Fordwich Arms in the image of my last two successful layouts, Pattyndenne and Rye Sands. This scheme steals buildings from a variety of sources, including a number from interesting East Anglian prototypes, as the focus is far more on characterful structures which fit the theme of a dying port than any specific location. I also find it far easier to build enthusiasm for a layout if it is based around real structures, which I can visualise in the scene.

The current dimensions of the layout are 1500x400mm (probably more like 450mm deep in the middle). This is probably a bit too large, as it is slightly bigger than what I can really get in my car. I could probably cut it down to 1200, but I'm keen to preserve a sense of space. The other options would be to break the layout into two 750x400 sections, but this poses it's own problems.

I'm planning to build the layout as an integral cameo, with L girder construction and a curved frontage. I'm also tempted to dabble with hand built or templot plug track, although I'm still not conviced I have the patience for either!


IMG_2505.jpg


The large low relief structures at the back of the layout will be based off the West Mill granary and Dunton Green brickworks/pottery. These will provide some traffic and rationale for the continued use of the yard in an otherwise inactive river port

GstR5FG-pBEyMfon7bQRMgLuIZnoR7GMeR9e9HDGoJspjWYLIQ.jpg

IMG_2478.jpg

The long, narrow building at the front of the plan will be based off a surviving example of hop pickers' accommodation. I'll be cribbing the building, but using it as a generic store building (perhaps home to a range of local traders).

1754284540824.png

I'm also planning on cramming in a downsized version of the footbridge from Walberswick!

1754284427662.png

This is likely to be a slow burn project, as I fancy trying a few new techniques (plus the focus is currently on finishing Rye Sands, ahead of the Uckfield show). However, I feel this format of this plan is one that is likely to have more enduring interest for me.

Will
 
Last edited:

Flaxfield

Western Thunderer
Liking this, Will.

Has great potential. I'm currently away on hols and without the distractions of modelling paraphernalia, I'm having a bit of a reset with my own projects, of which, more on my return.

Rob
 

Flaxfield

Western Thunderer
It a tested track plan. I have been toying with the same one for a few months. It was used to very good effect on a o gauge layout call Alexandra yard. I think it about right for what you are looking for. Go for it.
Marc

Can't disagree there, Mark. It's the same as Ewe though in my case, I chopped the staithes part off Iain Rice's 'Orford' plan and rotated it.

Works fine.

Rob
 

Willl

Western Thunderer
Can't disagree there, Mark. It's the same as Ewe though in my case, I chopped the staithes part off Iain Rice's 'Orford' plan and rotated it.

Works fine.

Rob

I was heavily inspired by both Ewe and the aforementioned Orford plan in the Light Railways book (which I bought recently and been thoroughly taken with). I also used a similar track plan on another stalled project, but with an additional siding opposing the kickback at the front of the Fordwich plan. this felt a bit too cramped and also reduced the size of the passing loop and both sidings to a pretty unworkable extent.

The provisional title for this incarnation of the Fordwich scheme is “Fordwich Haven” (or maybe Fordhaven, which would probably be more fitting for a Kent/Sussex-based layout).

I‘ve also toyed with a GER layout based on the Orford Haven (ESLR) quay scene*, and am trying to track down more images of the layout. I’ve got a few early MRJs on the way which will hopefully shed some more light on the matter.

*a longer term ambition as my GER stock and knowledge is currently lacking
 

Willl

Western Thunderer
After a few hours of playing around in Fusion I've got something resembling a laser cut baseboard kit. There are still some areas I haven't finished (particularly the curved fascia and lighting arch, which I've just mocked up)

I think it will be easier to size up and fit the curved parts of the fascia using traditional techniques (measure, cut, panic, fill, sand) as I'm struggling to see how they could be attached using the tab and slot approach I've used elsewhere.

It was surprisingly easy to design, but whether it actually fits together is a different question!

Screenshot 2025-08-05 215402.png

The upper level will be the trackbed, whilst the riverbed is a single piece

Screenshot 2025-08-05 215325.png

The track and river beds slot onto the top of the cross members (the brackets sticking out of the crossmembers support the ends of the two sidings, as I'm keen to avoid the ply trackbed warping at the ends). I also noticed whilst writing this that the left hand crossmembers will clash with the point motor for the headshunt, so I'll remove the vertical support and replace it with another angled bracket.

Screenshot 2025-08-05 215302.png

The cross members include holes for wiring runs and can be accessed through the bottom. I used a similar approach on Rye Sands, albeit done much more crudely! I'd ideally do the wiring/point motors before installing the trackbed, but the current arrangement of tabs would then preclude the baseboard from being assembled until the track is already down... some rethinking is needed

Screenshot 2025-08-05 215349.png

Will
 

2996 Victor

Western Thunderer
Just catching up with this, Will, and I have to say I like both the original concept and the updated version. Good to see the original is still "in build"!

Looking forward to your next update.

Cheers,
Mark
 

John D

Western Thunderer
Gosh Alexandra Yard, I must confess I was somewhat obsessed with that layout, saw it at a show at Chippenham and if I recall just as impressive in real life.

John Bruce.
My layout Alexandra Yard is still alive and well being relocated to Jim Mcgeown's (Connoisseur Models) workshop. It occasionally appears as a backdrop for his models on his website.
John
 
Top