Is this the press announcement for a new 1:32 West Country pacific? Or was Dikitriki's 3d tender frame the announcement? Hopefully it will be designed for scale frames and wheels to keep Simon C happy.
We just thought it might be of interest to some to show some new things we are considering.
It's all proof of concept at the moment, you often hear requests for scaling up etches, and you often hear replies of how hard it is, so, we (more I to begin with) decided to just see how hard it is.
We already have the 7mm etches so the idea is to see if they can be scaled up, but they must be accurate, take into consideration material thickness and other general unknown areas that may crop up.
The Battle of Britain was chosen for two reasons, I want one
and of the range it's simplest engine to build, it is after all, basically a brick
The first hurdle with the 7mm kit is that there are three cab variants and to save material space the original has parts for each cab dotted all over different etches, it's very efficient in that it condenses the etches which reduces costs, however if you want to test build just one complete cab you end up scaling up over five sheets, printing them off and then only using about 20% of the sum. That's working harder not smarter, it's also darned expensive
So, with a couple of days work I lifted all of the parts required to make up one complete cab, laid them all out onto a test etch and sent it off.
One of the first things we came across with scaling up was the actual sheet sizes, PPD minimum size is 12" on one edge, if you scale one cab sheet up it comes to about 9" by 14", length is no problem. This means that you're paying for a strip 14" x 3" of metal that is pure waste, you can't add another sheet on top as that'll make it 18" x 14" which PPD cannot use.
Fortunately, Martins method of laying parts out in sub blocks makes moving them around very easy on the art work, thus with a bit of effort you can end up with sheet sizes that maximise your cost benefits.
In short the one cab test sheet ends up at 12" x 8" even though you can quite clearly see it's not optimized for space at all. There are some areas where I'm winging it with tabs and layout spacing, the same method worked fine for the W1 but it may not for 1:32. Though the material is thicker so that should compensate, but that's what test etches are all about
If the cab builds up fine or requires just a few tweaks I'll run on with the rest of the etched parts, the body format is as yet undecided, it could be a full resin block, or full etch, in 1:32 it's easier to handle large areas like that and form some of the shapes, or it may be etched sides and front and a resin roof block. However, the test build will be an all nickle silver master and from that we can decide which bits we cast from for resin.
Regarding frames, yes, scale width, that's one of the immediate benefits of 1:32, no messing with S7 of OF spacers and other gauge crap, which for a developer is a huge slice of workload removed, also bear in mind that the Bulleids were already narrow framed so we will develop to that frame width.
As Simon seez, it's not a press release, it's more like, here's something were experimenting with and we thought you'd like to follow along and see how it progresses.
From the feed back we got at Doncaster over the W1 thread, there does seem to be an interest in how things are developed, what went wrong and what worked, tools and techniques used. We hope you enjoy the journey as much as we will.
Mick D