7mm Bleddfa Rd,

Pencarrow

Western Thunderer
Me use AI!! :eek:

The shed is still under construction, Alan and is roughly 50% complete.


View attachment 258592




Ade is spot on Alan, and there is no AI trickery involved, the only thing I can do with AI is to turn it off! :p

Geoff.

Looking very good Geoff.

I know many folk think it's madness to individually add bits of plasticard for each 'stone' but... It does end up being quicker than you think and I do think the result is well worth the effort. Plus you have a finish that's unique and doesn't look like one of the few stone finishes.
 

James

Western Thunderer
Looking very good Geoff.

I know many folk think it's madness to individually add bits of plasticard for each 'stone' but... It does end up being quicker than you think and I do think the result is well worth the effort. Plus you have a finish that's unique and doesn't look like one of the few stone finishes.
I added all the stones on one building for the NRM individually and it was surprisingly quick - quite relaxing too!
 

MoatLane

Western Thunderer
I used the Iliffe Stokes method 60 years ago with 'chads' of cardboard respresenting stone blocks, their thickness varied by carefully peeling away one or more of the layers of the card. It was surprisingly quick once the 'stones' were prepared and cut to different sizes. The surface needed sealing with shellac or varnish to stop the card from absorbing paint. It was also a great deal easier on the lungs than scribing DAS.
 

Geoff

Western Thunderer
Looking very good Geoff.

I know many folk think it's madness to individually add bits of plasticard for each 'stone' but... It does end up being quicker than you think and I do think the result is well worth the effort. Plus you have a finish that's unique and doesn't look like one of the few stone finishes.

Thanks Chris,

It is worth the effort to produce a finish that is unique and looks better than any embossed or moulded sheet. I just added a couple of courses in odd moments, we get a lot of those in this house, so it didn't take long to complete the first three walls.

I added all the stones on one building for the NRM individually and it was surprisingly quick - quite relaxing too!

I'm also finding it to be relaxing, James. I get the feeling that I'm really building something in the same way as I do when constructing track.

I used the Iliffe Stokes method 60 years ago with 'chads' of cardboard respresenting stone blocks, their thickness varied by carefully peeling away one or more of the layers of the card. It was surprisingly quick once the 'stones' were prepared and cut to different sizes. The surface needed sealing with shellac or varnish to stop the card from absorbing paint. It was also a great deal easier on the lungs than scribing DAS.

You beat me to it by mentioning chads sir!! :) The late Bob Barlow and Iain Rice inspired me to create brickwork using those in 4mm scale. I doubt that they will be easy to come by these days with the demise of punch cards, though I stand corrected. DAS has its uses, but it's hard work scribing stones into large surfaces.

Geoff.
 

Pencarrow

Western Thunderer
I know a lot of the war gaming and military modelling fraternity scribe and emboss finishes into a foam-like material. It seems to get results very quickly and, done well, can look very very convincing.

My main concern with that approach is that if something is very easily scribed then it's also very easily damaged. Not a problem if put on a layout and never touched or gone near again but... Having at first hand seen what layouts have to go through when exhibited, I would always worry that the exquisite finish could be trashed in seconds.

I have used DAS before too, quite a lot on my 4mm clay branch layout Polsarrett. I quite like it, particularly the stone effect variety they make. I don't think it's any quicker or easier than my other plasticard based methods though.

What I always try and aim for is a finish that doesn't look like sheets straight out of a pack and stuck to a model. My pet hate is to see buildings and structures with no attempt to hide sheet or corner joints. (That's a particularly a problem with the same Wills sheets IMO). As soon as you see the sheet, you've destroyed the realism.

On the other hand, I really like and appreciate work such as that done by Geoff a few posts earlier.
 

Geoff

Western Thunderer
I assume that you are referring to foamboard, Chris? The softer boards as sold in Hobbycraft and those used for food packaging are easily damaged. However, better quality boards such as 'Palight' are much firmer and feel like styrene sheet. I used some to construct my 4mm engine shed, scribing the stonework into its surface with a blunt ballpoint pen. Care has to be taken to keep any exposed edges away from solvents though..

Shed build 2.jpg

Geoff.

 

Pencarrow

Western Thunderer
I assume that you are referring to foamboard, Chris? The softer boards as sold in Hobbycraft and those used for food packaging are easily damaged. However, better quality boards such as 'Palight' are much firmer and feel like styrene sheet. I used some to construct my 4mm engine shed, scribing the stonework into its surface with a blunt ballpoint pen. Care has to be taken to keep any exposed edges away from solvents though..

View attachment 258704

Geoff.


Thanks Geoff. I suspect asking me to keep solvents away from a build is asking for trouble. :))
 
Top