Rye Sands

Neil

Western Thunderer
Controversial question….

this is an evocative picture of a fictional environment - beautifully modelled by Will, and turned into a “fake” postcard by Dave…

I’m guessing that we all rather like it.

I suspect that we’d all be very critical if it were produced by AI…

That's an interesting question. I guess that part of the reason we like the image is that it's a result of craft, imagination, artistic sensibilities and human judgement. These things we applaud when we see them across a range of endeavours. AI seems not to do nuance; I guess we've all had the frustration of talking to the robot on the phone or conversing with one on the chat box when all you want to do is speak to a human in customer enquiries. AI may be good at number crunching but **** all use at replacing a human where judgement, flexibility or taste is required.
 

simond

Western Thunderer
I don’t have an AI engine but perhaps there’s a Thunderer who does. I know there are several users on RMW.

It would be interesting to see the results if one were to ask it (given the same starting photo) to produce an equivalent image.
 

Willl

Western Thunderer
@Willl - to save clogging up and following on from Rob's thread Tales from The Room of Doom this is the sort of thing which can be achieved with the old photo textures.

A folded battered postcard with signs of scratches, wear and tear as if carried in a pocket for ages.

View attachment 265743

This is fantastic Dave, my jaw probably dropped a little when I saw it! I have been plotting to write a sort of fiction around the next layout project, accompanied by postcards, letters etc. (as Iain Rice and Bob Barlow discussed doing with the East Suffolk), so will have to make an attempt at something similar

On the AI thought, I also think the key is that editing photos requires skill… I have a long history of dabbling in photography and would argue that good editing can be almost as tricky as taking the photo in the first place. I’m sure there are those who would argue that prompt engineering is also a skill, but it feels a bit like asking someone to paint a portrait for you, and then claiming you were the artist!

Will
 

Terry

Western Thunderer
I’m sure there are those who would argue that prompt engineering is also a skill, but it feels a bit like asking someone to paint a portrait for you, and then claiming you were the artist!
Or buying a model railway from its creator and happily revelling in the kudos of exhibiting it! Plenty of that going on from what I have seen.

Terry
 

Willl

Western Thunderer
Or buying a model railway from its creator and happily revelling in the kudos of exhibiting it! Plenty of that going on from what I have seen.

Terry

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that as long as you aren’t passing it off as your own work - there’s an interesting piece on this topic in Ribbons 2 by the OTCM duo. Some layouts deserve to be exhibited, even after the original owner has moved it on or passed away.

Will
 

Flaxfield

Western Thunderer
I found the articles ( there was another one in a similar vein in another of James Hiltons books ) a bit odd. I mean, if you are going to exhibit a layout which was bought and not built by you, you need to be prepared to answer questions about it's construction etc.
My first ( and second, actually) layout was sold to a nice chap in County Durham and are exhibited, last time being at York this year where Sheep Lane was being shown. I was invited by the new owner to go along for the weekend to help operate, but being Easter, I had to sadly decline. A pity as I would have taken the original stock along.

As an aside, a couple of years ago now, I did see a piece on Sheep Dip on a club website, attributing the layout to the new owner with lots of inaccuracies about its construction. I did write to the club to correct things but never received a response from them..

Rob
 

Terry

Western Thunderer
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that as long as you aren’t passing it off as your own work - there’s an interesting piece on this topic in Ribbons 2 by the OTCM duo. Some layouts deserve to be exhibited, even after the original owner has moved it on or passed away.

Will
I agree. But do the exhibitors deserve to be doing the exhibiting? It strikes me as a quick way to get into the joys of exhibiting without actually creating anything.

Terry

Sorry Will. I appear to be stealing your thread.
 
Last edited:

Vaughan45

Western Thunderer
Interesting - two of the small number of layouts I have sold during the last 20 years are still being exhibited.

The owner of the O gauge micro does credit me with the initial built and still posts entries on the thread I started on the other place, in addition to starting a separate thread for the companion micro he is building. The work he has done on the one I sold him has enhanced it greatly.

The O-16.5 / NG7 layout I sold about 15 years ago has been sold on two or three times since my initial sale and I believe the current owner has no knowledge of my involvement.
 
Top