Cornish confusion and Tubal Cain

Overseer

Western Thunderer
No, nothing to do with Cornwall. 'Cornish' was a locomotive owned by Cornish and Bruce, the contractors who built the Melbourne to Bendigo railway in Victoria between 1858 and 1862. William Crocker Cornish and John Vans Agnew Bruce built the 102 mile double track main line on time and to budget but unfortunately Cornish died during the works at the age of 44, and Bruce died at the age of 41 a year after completion of the contract. They are recorded as owning 4 locomotives and hiring another from the Victorian Railways.

Keith Turton, of PO wagon fame, undertook extensive research during the 1970s into the contractor's locomotives used in Victoria, and published four or five articles in the ARHS Bulletin. There are no known photographs of 'Cornish' but several photos of a locomotive known to have been rebuilt from Cornish, and an 1860s sales notice listing the dimensions. More recently Daniel Gooch's specification for the Geelong locomotives have become available. The problem is the dimensions and descriptions do not match. There must have been two locomotives named 'Cornish'. It is recorded in official sources and contemporary newspapers that Cornish and Bruce purchased the ex Geelong and Melbourne Railway 0-6-0 goods locomotive 'Tubal Cain' and named it 'Cornish'. Tubal Cain was one of four 0-6-0 locomotives designed by Daniel Gooch at Swindon and built by R&W Hawthorns, builders numbers 927, 928, 929 and 930 of 1855. Tubal Cain is usually quoted as being builders number 928 but could have been 930. Tubal Cain was an 0-6-0 well tank with outside frames and 4'9" diameter wheels. A local newspaper recorded 'Cornish' arriving in Castlemaine during 1862 and states it had been purchased from the government. This Cornish was an 0-6-0 tender locomotive with 5' diameter wheels. It is reported to have been built by Hawthorns, probably correctly as the sales notice also states it is a Hawthorn locomotive. The builders number has been quoted since the 1970s as 928 but this cannot be correct so the builders number is unknown.

This photograph is the closest I have found to an image which might show some of the Geelong and Melbourne Railway goods locomotives. The locomotive on the passenger train is one of two ex G&MR 2-2-2WT passenger locos built by Stephensons which remained in service with Victorian Railways for many years, the larger passenger locos and the goods locos inherited from the G&MR saw little use.
Williamstown early geelong locos reduced.jpg

This is an enlargement of part of the image above which could show two of the goods locos, in partially stripped form between two wagons.
Williamstown early geelong locos crop.jpg

I put together a comparison of the Gooch Specification for the G&MR goods locos and the dimensions provided in the 1863 and 1868 newspaper sales notices, which also states that a full set of spares was also for sale, and gave the original purchase price - both strongly suggesting that the Cornish being sold was not the ex G&MR loco purchased from the Victorian Railways.
Hawthorn Engines Comparison 1.jpg
A Gooch drawing for two of the passenger locomotives built by Stothert and Slaughter survives. It is not completely clear. I could build a model of the boiler and frames but not sure how the rear bunker/tank, cab area and wing tanks would have looked. This is the drawing with some tracing over it to try and work out how it looked. A 2-2-2 tank with 6'6" flangeless driving wheels.
gmr slaughter.jpg

The four passenger locomotives built by Hawthorns alongside the goods locos shared the same dimensions and specification so probably looked similar but could have had detail differences. Using the Gooch drawing as a basis I have come up with this as a possible interpretation of how the goods locos looked, still a work in progress.
GMR Hawthorn 060.jpg

Part of the inspiration for the drawing is this photograph of Mars on the Whitehaven & Furness Junction Railway, built by R&W Hawthorns b/n 997 of 1857. It is a similar sized 0-4-2 locomotive built by Hawthorns and the HMRS have a copy of a drawing for it in their collection. Just a coincidence that William Meikle (my avatar portrait) was locomotive superintendent of the Whitehaven & Furness Junction Railway for many years before moving on to the Dublin, Wickford and Wexford Railway before moving to Melbourne and becoming Locomotive Overseer of the Victorian Railways, so was responsible for the W&FJR Hawthorn locos.
Hawthorn 997 W&FJR Mars.jpeg

If anyone has knowledge of 1850s Hawthorns locomotive or ideas of how Tubal Cain should look I would like to hear before the model progresses too far. Also if anyone has any idea what the building number of the second 'Cornish' was I would be grateful, the agents were probably de Pass Brothers.

A start has been made, just. A set of Slaters broad gauge S7 carrying wheels work out close enough for 4'9" in 1:48 scale. The broad gauge axles have been turned down to move the wheels in to 5'3" gauge and shortened a little.
gmr wheels1.jpg

And just incase anyone needs more to read, this is the text of the 1862 newspaper article which has caused some of the confusion regarding Cornish -


Herald, Saturday 30 August 1862, page 5

FIRST LOCOMOTIVE ON THE LINE AT CASTLEMAINE.
The M. A. Mail says : — Yesterday, the first locomotive placed on the line in this district reached its destination, in safety after undergoing many troubles and trials. The tender was successfully launched on Wednesday, but the engine was the occasion of far greater anxiety. It was originally one of the Geelong Railway Company's engines, and came into the possession of the Government on the purchase of the Geelong line. Since then it has been thoroughly repaired and overhauled at the Railway Foundry here, and has been re-christened the "Cornish." At about one o'clock yesterday it made its exit from Cornish and Bruce's foundry, mounted on a truck constructed expressly for the transport of such ponderous bodies, and drawn by seventeen horses, the property of Latham and Co., as fine a set of animals as ever were harnessed. The engine was covered with flags, and as it passed up Barker street was the occasion of considerable curiosity, a large number of persons following to see its transhipment. All went well till reaching Parker street. As our readers are probably aware, the lower part of that street, though it has not been the subject of municipal improvements or experiments, as the case may be, is still in a very bad condition, and, when within about two hundred yards of the railway line, snap went the fore axle, and the huge load careened, as though about to capsize. This latter calamity, however, did not occur, and screwjacks having been promptly set to work, the broken axle was released and sent off for repair, whilst one end of the engine, sustained by the screwjacks, was hoisted in the air. The weight of the whole is about 17 tons, exclusive of the wheels. After a delay of nearly three hours, the broken axle, which had been welded in the meantime, was again attached, the truck lowered on to it, and another start made. Scarcely, however, had more than a few yards been accomplished, when another wrench took place, a linch pin was pushed out, and the faulty axle was bent till the wheels grated against the engine. Another halt was made, the screwjack put again into requisition, and the linch-pin, with some trouble, replaced. When this was effected, the load again set in motion, and to the great relief of all engaged was safely placed on the line ready for raising on to its wheels. During the last part of the work the axle gave way slightly, and had there been another hundred yards to traverse, would have in all probability again broken in half. Three cheers were given heartily on the arrival of the engine at its destination. In the course of to-day steam will, we believe, be got up in the Cornish, if placed on the rails without accident and in sufficient time. It is intended to use the engine to draw ballast trucks, and we understand its use will greatly facilitate the operations of the contractors. The line, we may observe, has been excellently constructed, though delay has been occasioned through the late wet weather. The contractors for the works in the neighbourhood have faithfully done their part, and not a slip or fault of any kind has been manifested. The engine can now travel from here to the Porcupine, and very shortly will be able to extend its journey to Bendigo. Apropos of the railway and railway matters, we are glad to state that the inactivity complained of by our Sandhurst contemporary in the erection of the station has not been shown in Castlemaine, and the contract is being pushed rapidly forward. Owing to the soft nature of the ground, and also to the fact that the site has been honeycombed by the diggers, considerable and unexpected difficulties have arisen in laying the foundations, as much as from 16 to 20 feet having to be gone through before reaching the bed-rock. Altogether, we have great reason for congratulation at the energetic manner in which the whole works in connection with the railway are being carried out, and in a very few weeks, if the weather holds up, we shall realise that long, desired boon - railway communication between Sandhurst, Castlemaine, and Melbourne.​
 

Rob R

Western Thunderer
There a couple of photos about of the Cowes ans Newport Slaughter Grunning 222wt tanks, which although a bit later may still have a family resemblence.
 

Ian@StEnochs

Western Thunderer
Hi Fraser,

So nice to see you tackling another interesting project. One which won't be the subject of an RTR or even a kit although somebody might have a go at a 3D print!

A fascinating story you have laid out for us and I like your out 'of the box' thinking to use Broad gauge wheels. More power to your elbow.

I read through everything this morning at breakfast and was really interested in the photo of the R&W Hawthorn 'Mars,. Coincidently I have just drawn up and placed an order for some 3D printed wheels for an engine built by the same company, however another Patrick Stirling design for the G&SWR. This one was built in 1854/5 so only a couple of years between them but mine is a bit of an odd ball being an 0-2-2-0 with a central crankshaft. I have a damaged copy of the Hawthorns elevation GA and a pretty good copy of the end sections but there doesn't seem to be any surviving, if there ever were, photographs. Stirling had quite a few of his G&SW engines built by Hawthorns so I think I might glean some ideas for details from your photo.

Ian.

PS your mention of Tubal Cain immediately set my brain back to my larger scale Model Engineering days when TC was a stalwart of the Model Engineer.
 
Last edited:

Overseer

Western Thunderer
Thanks Rob.

Thanks Ian. There is a side elevation drawing of the G&SWR intermediate crank shaft locos in The British Steam Railway Locomotive - From 1825 to 1925 on page 87. Not sure how accurate it is, it is credited to The Engineer who seem to have often had photographs of their drawing subjects but it could be a tracing of the GA. It will be an interesting model.

I am not sure why the Victorian Railways made so little use of the Geelong & Melbourne Railway locomotives after take over, apart from the two Stephenson locos. One of the goods engines, Hercules, was sold prior to the takeover to the Melbourne Suburban Railway Co who built a line a few miles through Richmond to near Hawthorn. They took a week to move the loco from Spencer Street station along Flinders Street to Princes Bridge station. I still hope to see a photograph of Hercules being moved along Flinders Street, but it is unlikely. The newspaper report of the move is :-
Argus, Saturday 29 January 1859, page 6
THE SUBURBAN RAILWAY.-Yesterday evening the locomotive engine “Hercules," which has lately been purchased by the Suburban Railway Company from the Melbourne and Geelong Company, arrived at the terminus near Prince's Bridge, after a journey of almost a week along Flinders-street from the Spencer-street terminus. The engine has not yet been put upon the rails of the Richmond line, but is close to the station. It is expected that on Tuesday next the first train will he run on the line. The “Hercules" has been moved from one station to the other by means of rails, laid down in short lengths along the street, and moving the engine upon them by means of levers. All the servants have been engaged, and have had experience in the various duties which they will be called upon to perform.

Hercules continued in operation until 1869 when it was offered for sale by the Melbourne & Hobsons Bay United Railway Co, apparently in good condition.

Meanwhile, one of the newspaper reports of Tubal Cain being purchased by Cornish & Bruce is here-
Geelong Advertiser, Friday 13 January 1860, p2
The eight o'clock train yesterday morning from Melbourne did not reach Geelong until twelve noon. This was owing to the Tubal Cain engine blocking up the rails near Footscray, where the same Tubal Cain got off the line as she was turning the sharp curve known as Zeal and Darbyshire's "original," at that spot. Nothing serious was the consequence beyond the delay to the passengers. The Tubal Cain was sold on Wednesday to Mr Bruce, for use on the Bendigo line of railway, for £3,700. She was delivered to two of Mr Bruce's men yesterday morning, who duly took charge of the engine, and consequently it was not under the company's control at the time of the mishap.

Tubal Cain, as Cornish, could not have lasted in service long with Cornish and Bruce as the second Cornish entered service in August 1862. The confusion that the Cornish in Castlemaine was the old Geelong loco was remembered in 1875 when the second Cornish was rebuilt at the Phoenix Foundry in Ballarat -
The Age, Wednesday 20 October 1875, page 2
An engine was tried on the Williamstown line yesterday, which has been recently turned out of the Phoenix Foundry, Ballarat. It is not inappropriately called the Phoenix, for it contains parts of an engine named Tubal Cain, once the property of the Geelong Company, and subsequently named "Cornish," the property of Messrs. Cornish and Bruce, by whom it was used during the construction of the Mount Alexander line. The engine may now be said to be nearly a new one. It has been made to the order of Mr. Doran, the contractor for the Inglewood and Sandhurst line. The builders offer to try the Phoenix against anything of its calibre on the Government lines either for speed, tractive power, or economy of fuel. The engine, which is a coupled six-wheeled locomotive, weighs 23 tons under steam. Yesterday's trial gave entire satisfaction. She kept good time, though there were several long detentions, and worked smoothly.

Phoenix continued in use by several contractors for years and was later renamed Ivanhoe. This is Ivanhoe during the 1890s. I am sure the loco frames, wheels and motion are the original parts from the second Cornish, as is the tender. The cab is a Phoenix Foundry copy of the William Meikle design for Victorian Railways locos being built by Phoenix at the time. The boiler could be new or the original one patched up.
Phoenix Ivanhoe crop.jpg

Phoenix Foundry used the "complete set of spare parts" offered for sale in 1868 to build another locomotive, named Maori, in 1876.
Maori Phoenix 32 1887.jpg
Maori appears to incorporate the spare frames and motion supplied with Cornish II. The cab is a copy of a Beyer Peacock design used on the F class 2-4-0 locos being built by Phoenix. The tender is definitely from 'Bruce', a Vulcan Foundry product (431 of 1859) for which drawings survive. Bruce was sold at the same time as Cornish. The smaller driving wheels appear to have been modified or fabricated. On the larger version of the photo the large bosses, which look like the large bosses on Cornish, are actually flat plates fixed to the front of the wheels instead of being cast with the spokes.

Back to Tubal Cain, despite what contemporary newspaper reporters said in their articles, I am sure none of it was incorporated in the Cornish put on the line at Castlemaine in 1862.
 

Ian@StEnochs

Western Thunderer
Thanks Fraser.

I have a larger scale copy of that drawing. Dimension wise it fits with the Hawthorn GA pretty closely.

Interesting if that is a broken spoke on Māori. It would be wrought iron rather than cast at that time. It looks like it got a knock but I would expect to see some marks on the adjacent spokes.
 

Osgood

Western Thunderer
That's interesting, Rob.
Fair bit of offset weight there, although academic as the wheels have no balance weights anyway by the look of it.
 

Overseer

Western Thunderer
Fascinating research!
And is that a broken spoke on Maori at 9pm?
If so the first I’ve seen recorded in an image.

View attachment 252485
It looks like it might be a break in the spoke rather than damage to the photograph. This is the highest resolution I have.
Maori Phoenix b21320 wheel.jpg
A wrought iron spoke would have bent rather than snapped. The wheels were probably cast iron. Phoenix Foundry were skilled at iron casting, casting cylinders etc in house. I am not sure they made the wheels though, if they had they would have included the crank pin hole in the casting. I think these were second hand tender wheels adapted to driving wheels. The tyres were the difficult part, needing special iron and later steel to achieve durability so most tyres were imported from the UK or sometimes Germany.

@Rob R 's illustrations of outside frame 2-4-0 tender locos certainly look familiar. This photo is a Victorian Railways B class express passenger loco circa 1900, one of 13 built by R&W Hawthorn (bn 1138 to 1160) in 1862-3, with the first on register January 1863. Beyer Peacock also built 13 at the same time, the first of theirs was put on register in July 1862. These all had outside sandwich frames, Beyer Peacock built another six in 1872 with solid steel outside frames. Phoenix Foundry in Ballarat built two more in 1880-1. They were more modern locos than the mid 1850s locos but out of date by 1880, although the last couple continued in service until mid 1917. VR also purchased the equivalent 0-6-0 goods locos at the same time, the first six being built by Slaughter, Gruning in 1862, 12 by R Stephenson 1862-3 with later ones built by Beyer Peacock, Yorkshire Engine Co, Williamstown Workshops (the first VR workshops seen in the first photo in the first post) and Phoenix Foundry in Ballarat.
B Hawthorns cr005709 r.jpg
 

Ian@StEnochs

Western Thunderer
Rob,

Thanks for reproducing those detail drawings which will be very useful for my build. Hawthorns built a number of engines for the G&SWR while Patrick Stirling was locomotive superintendent and he continued to use them after he moved to the GNR. There is evidence that some of the details were done by the builders and subsequently adopted by Stirling in locomotives built at Kilmarnock.

Fraser,

I just wonder how much the customer actually designed when using an outside contractor to build the engines. Did they just set the specification and a few dimensions and leave the details to the builder? I rather think the later which would be why the close family resemblance. I have seen a note somewhere that specified the delivery of the order for locomotives had to include a full set of drawings.

Ian.
 

Rob R

Western Thunderer
Fraser,
My first 3 2-4-0 views are OW&WR of 1852/3, just a couple of years before Tubal Cain.
They also had some 0-6-0's at the same time in the same style.
From the Loco Magazine April 15th 1915.

I haven't worked out when the "dustbin" dome covers went out of fashion.

Hawthorn 0-6-0 1.jpgHawthorn 0-6-0 2.jpg
A little earlier (1850) for the GNR
116 class
 
Last edited:

Overseer

Western Thunderer
I haven't worked out when the "dustbin" dome covers went out of fashion.
Funny you should mention it. I was reading in Ahrons yesterday while checking where the drawing was for Ian's G&SWR loco and noticed Ahron's comment that Hawthorns started using them in 1840 and continued for 15 years. I don't think he used the term dustbin and I can't find the quote when checking just now.

The domes on your illustrations of the North British locos built by Hawthorn reminded me of something - this not very clear photo -
Bruce or Cornish.jpg

This photograph is thought to be of Bruce, Vulcan Foundry 431 of 1859. It matches the drawings of Bruce, except for the large dome. Bruce was built domeless. I wouldn't expect such an ornate dome cover to be provided if fitting a dome to the boiler of a contractor's locomotive, it could have been but it seems unlikely when another of Cornish & Bruce's locos, First Victorian (built in Melbourne by Enoch Chambers in 1862 and not actually the first loco built in Melbourne or Victoria) had a basic fabricated dome cover. First Victorian was later renamed Echuca.

The Vulcan Foundry diagram for Bruce, including the tender seen previously behind Maori. Note the domeless boiler. The safety valve cover looks similar to the blurry photo. I don't know if a dome was fitted to Bruce - there could be later photographs of the boiler as it was sold for use in Tasmania and the firebox casing still survives in Ulverstone.
Vulcan Bruce no 431 De Pass & Sons London 1859.jpg

The similarity of the dome in the photo with the domes supplied by Hawthorns to the North British Railway makes me less certain that the photograph shows Bruce. It could be the second Cornish, which is recorded as built by R&W Hawthorn (but the builders number is unknown as it is not one of the ex Geelong locos). The safety valve cover visible on Ivanhoe also looks the same.

This photo of Echuca (originally First Victorian) shows the more home made style of dome cover I would expect to have been retrofitted to Bruce.
Echuca loco side.jpg

Apologies to all who are not interested in solving obscure locomotive mysteries. I have been trying, on and off, to work out what Cornish looked like for quite a few decades. It would be good to confirm what at least one of the two Cornish's looked like so I can build models of them, although I will probably build the first Cornish as Tubal Cain, or Hercules, or Samson, or Goliath.
 

Overseer

Western Thunderer
As a further drift away from Cornish, the photo of Echuca reminded me that there is also another photograph taken at exactly the same place at a similar time, of 'Darling'.

darling b21116 r.jpg

Darling was ordered in 1858 from William Fairbairn of Manchester by Evans, Merry, Williams & Little, the contractors for the Geelong to Ballarat railway line. It was a Crewe type 2-4-0, very similar to some of the LNWR locos and more so to the Highland Railway goods locos but not quite the same as any. A drawing has been underway for this loco with a view to building one sometime, but not before I finish the two part finished Highland Railway locos with Crewe front ends. Darling was first named Warrenheip after one of the volcanic cone hills near Ballarat, renamed Darling by Collier, Barry & Co the contractors for the Bendigo to Echuca line in 1864. There was possibly a second loco of the same design delivered.

Darling disappeared after the Echuca line contract. Turton had a note in his articles under 'Rosedale', used on the construction of the Sale to Morwell line in 1876 that he thought Rosedale could be one of the Fairbairn 2-4-0s. A photograph has come to light which confirms his theory, showing Rosedale at the Great Morwell Brown Coal mine during the 1890s. The glass negative is damaged but the Rosedale nameplate is just legible on the high resolution scan. The loco is barely changed from its original condition, a roof and cab upper side sheets being the only visible addition. Not bad going for a 1859 locomotive to still be running in far from ideal conditions in the 1890s after a hard life, including being described as having cracked driving wheels and a bent frame in 1889.

Rosedale Darling cg002102 r.jpg
 

AJC

Western Thunderer
This is all fascinating, Fraser. Aside from a minor interest in these Crewe-type locos, it's really interesting to see how the railways of Australia were constructed and I suppose give the relative pace of development of the colony's industry it's surprising that these apparently unsuited machines were put to this purpose. And of course, the detective work always appeals. Thank you for sharing.

Adam
 

Bombardier1923

New Member
Slightly late to the party on this but I've been conducting my own research into the G&MR and their rolling stock for some years now with the intention of recreating parts of it in 3D. While originally focused on just the Second Class coaches, the project has slowly grown to encompass their entire fleet. It has been a source of some annoyance how little visual reference exists for the Stothert & Slaughter / R&W Hawthorns group which made up the bulk of the G&MR's motive power, but so much existing for the trio of small engines the G&MR operated.

I personally do believe that Cornish is indeed Tubal-Cain renamed, although I've yet to find sale information which would point to spares being sold ex VR to Cornish & Bruce that later find their way into Berwick/Maori. Given a number of Gooch and Hawthorn's features being visible in Phoenix/Ivanhoe (the Gooch safety valve cover, smokebox with wingplates extremely close to the Stothert drawing and visible Gooch valve gear being key clues to its origin, as well as the Hawthorns style splashers), and the relative closeness in dimension of Cornish to the known dimensions of the goods group. This would, of course, mean the sale listing is incorrect about the driving wheel diameter, but the alternative is multiple papers misreported it being an ex Geelong engine, including the Geelong Advertiser who reported Tubal Cain sold to Mr. Bruce on January 11th 1860 (which derailed on it's delivery run to Bruce at Footscray!) Additionally, the issue of Phoenix/Ivanhoe being a inside framed engine while Tubal Cain being outside framed arises, but contemporary papers reported new frames were erected for "Phoenix" when it was under construction, and it incorporated parts of the old Cornish but wasn't described as being a rebuild (similar to the harvesting of "Avenel" for the "Colac" a few months later). Indeed, the shot of Phoenix/Ivanhoe to my eye shows modified outside cranked drivers, accounting for the 3 piece design for the wheel bosses (axle-boss-crank).

This fairly quick interpretation of the goods locos comes from both my ongoing work on the passenger group of engines (which the extant GA and scattered illustrations by Edward Snell have been a wonderful help in) and a pair of illustrations made of the engine "Goliath" when in use in Clunes as a water pump for the Port Phillip and Colonial Gold Mining Company, which shows the Hawthorn style splashers and large water tank the group were built with. The tanks necessitated moving the springs underneath the axleboxes, as otherwise a very large cutout would be needed in the tanks to accommodate. My model is still very unfinished and uncertain to be accurate (I'm not sure if it'd have cab side sheets since these don't appear in the illustrations of the passenger engines, and the smokebox door was more likely circular based on the Clunes drawings and the Williamstown photo). I also include a possible photo of Hercules, another of the G&MR goods locos, behind Princes Bridge c1865. It's hazy and small, but the general proportions match the Clunes drawings and is of some interest.
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    590.5 KB · Views: 11
  • image (2).png
    image (2).png
    249.6 KB · Views: 10
  • Screenshot 2026-07-20 152126.png
    Screenshot 2026-07-20 152126.png
    704.2 KB · Views: 11
  • Screenshot 2026-07-20 152221.png
    Screenshot 2026-07-20 152221.png
    450.1 KB · Views: 11

Overseer

Western Thunderer
Slightly late to the party on this but I've been conducting my own research into the G&MR and their rolling stock for some years now with the intention of recreating parts of it in 3D. While originally focused on just the Second Class coaches, the project has slowly grown to encompass their entire fleet. It has been a source of some annoyance how little visual reference exists for the Stothert & Slaughter / R&W Hawthorns group which made up the bulk of the G&MR's motive power, but so much existing for the trio of small engines the G&MR operated.

I personally do believe that Cornish is indeed Tubal-Cain renamed, although I've yet to find sale information which would point to spares being sold ex VR to Cornish & Bruce that later find their way into Berwick/Maori. Given a number of Gooch and Hawthorn's features being visible in Phoenix/Ivanhoe (the Gooch safety valve cover, smokebox with wingplates extremely close to the Stothert drawing and visible Gooch valve gear being key clues to its origin, as well as the Hawthorns style splashers), and the relative closeness in dimension of Cornish to the known dimensions of the goods group. This would, of course, mean the sale listing is incorrect about the driving wheel diameter, but the alternative is multiple papers misreported it being an ex Geelong engine, including the Geelong Advertiser who reported Tubal Cain sold to Mr. Bruce on January 11th 1860 (which derailed on it's delivery run to Bruce at Footscray!) Additionally, the issue of Phoenix/Ivanhoe being a inside framed engine while Tubal Cain being outside framed arises, but contemporary papers reported new frames were erected for "Phoenix" when it was under construction, and it incorporated parts of the old Cornish but wasn't described as being a rebuild (similar to the harvesting of "Avenel" for the "Colac" a few months later). Indeed, the shot of Phoenix/Ivanhoe to my eye shows modified outside cranked drivers, accounting for the 3 piece design for the wheel bosses (axle-boss-crank).

This fairly quick interpretation of the goods locos comes from both my ongoing work on the passenger group of engines (which the extant GA and scattered illustrations by Edward Snell have been a wonderful help in) and a pair of illustrations made of the engine "Goliath" when in use in Clunes as a water pump for the Port Phillip and Colonial Gold Mining Company, which shows the Hawthorn style splashers and large water tank the group were built with. The tanks necessitated moving the springs underneath the axleboxes, as otherwise a very large cutout would be needed in the tanks to accommodate. My model is still very unfinished and uncertain to be accurate (I'm not sure if it'd have cab side sheets since these don't appear in the illustrations of the passenger engines, and the smokebox door was more likely circular based on the Clunes drawings and the Williamstown photo). I also include a possible photo of Hercules, another of the G&MR goods locos, behind Princes Bridge c1865. It's hazy and small, but the general proportions match the Clunes drawings and is of some interest.
Interesting to see some alternative assumptions regarding the form of Tubal Cain and his brothers. I am not convinced the wing tanks were fitted to the goods locos. They would have made access to the valve gear difficult, the drawings of Goliath at Clunes definitely don't show them in one view and the other looks like something in front of the loco, and on one side only.

The 'Cornish' assembled in Castlemaine was certainly not Tubal Cain renamed 'Cornish'. Bruce paid £3700 for Tubal Cain in January 1860, while the 1868 sales notices state that Cornish cost £5105 13s 1d new. Cornish & Bruce's executors certainly had the records from the partnership. The only things in common between Tubal Cain and the Cornish assembled at Castlemaine were the cylinder dimensions, and they were both built by Hawthorns. Cornish and Bruce (the locomotives) were advertised for sale in the Sydney Morning Herald in March 1867, having failed to sell in 1863, as -"BARGAIN - For SALE, in working order, two locomotive ENGINES and TENDERS (5 feet 3 inch gauge), with duplicates-one a most powerful engine, equal to new : price for the whole , £2500. The duplicates, which alone cost more than this sum, may be constructed into engines to suit any gauge, or to be used as stationary power. Also....."

It is a pity that Charles Nettleton's panoramic view of Melbourne was not a bit closer, the camera was nearly a mile from the locomotive. I am still hoping to see a photograph of Tubal Cain, Hercules, or the others, to confirm their details.
Nettleton Princes Bridge a53197 crop.jpg
 
Top