In October, 1978, The Railway Modeller published an article by Roy Link called 'The art of compromise.' The article suggested that a blend of diorama and working layout could provide the answer to lack of space and inertia brought about by an 'undecorated expanse of baseboard.' The author provided a plan of a small country terminus with a single short platform with run round loop and two sidings. One siding housed a goods shed and the other coal bins. There was also a small ground frame and a weighbridge and office. This was all achieved (in theory) on a baseboard measuring just six feet by one foot. The article suggested that, although it would be possible to shunt the yard using the single line in front of the station platform, the layout would be enhanced by the addition of a small fiddle yard. I filed away the article with a view to building the layout sometime. I often thought about the magazine article and occasionally got it out for another read through, but never actually got around to starting it.
The years rolled by and various articles appeared in the model railway press by other people who had also got the 'art of compromise bug'. But they all had the same thing in common. In attempting to build the suggested layout, they found it was impossible! The author had simply shoe-horned too much detail into the width of the baseboard beyond the end of the platform. The author had also placed a turnout exactly halfway along the six-foot baseboard, making it impossible to divide the baseboard into two three foot lengths for storage and transportation.
At the end of 2018 I finally decided to have a go at building this layout. I apologise for the rather hazy pictures, caused I suspect by my shed lighting.
I decided to use Peco code 75 turnouts together with C&L track as I already had these to hand. First off, I decided to alter the plan slightly and move the turnout away from the centre of the baseboard to allow it to be divided in half. I also decided to include two catch points in the sidings where they meet the 'main line.' I had plenty of wood to hand retrieved from previous layouts. I also had some lengths of 5mm thick plywood which I decided to use as the baseboard surface. The plywood had previously been cut to fourteen inches wide so I decided to utilize those extra two inches to try and achieve something akin to the original plan. The scenic baseboard measures six feet by fourteen inches with a small board for the fiddle yard, thirty inches long.
I drew out the track plan on the baseboard surface and drilled and filed small slots where the turnout tiebars were situated. This was so that I could utilise the small hole in the Peco tiebars for operation. At this stage I decided to use, for the first time, point motors to throw the tiebars. A small bit of research showed that Gaugemaster Seep point motors, PM1, contain contacts to change the polarity of the common crossing (frog). I ordered the four motors required and set about laying the track.
The sleepers of the Peco turnouts are much thicker than the C&L sleepers on the plain track. To arrive at a situation where the rail height is the same for plain track and turnouts, I pinned the turnouts directly to the baseboard surface and fixed the plain track to a card track bed previously glued to the baseboard. The two sidings on the length of white card in the picture above will form the fiddle-yard.
Terry
The years rolled by and various articles appeared in the model railway press by other people who had also got the 'art of compromise bug'. But they all had the same thing in common. In attempting to build the suggested layout, they found it was impossible! The author had simply shoe-horned too much detail into the width of the baseboard beyond the end of the platform. The author had also placed a turnout exactly halfway along the six-foot baseboard, making it impossible to divide the baseboard into two three foot lengths for storage and transportation.
At the end of 2018 I finally decided to have a go at building this layout. I apologise for the rather hazy pictures, caused I suspect by my shed lighting.
I decided to use Peco code 75 turnouts together with C&L track as I already had these to hand. First off, I decided to alter the plan slightly and move the turnout away from the centre of the baseboard to allow it to be divided in half. I also decided to include two catch points in the sidings where they meet the 'main line.' I had plenty of wood to hand retrieved from previous layouts. I also had some lengths of 5mm thick plywood which I decided to use as the baseboard surface. The plywood had previously been cut to fourteen inches wide so I decided to utilize those extra two inches to try and achieve something akin to the original plan. The scenic baseboard measures six feet by fourteen inches with a small board for the fiddle yard, thirty inches long.
I drew out the track plan on the baseboard surface and drilled and filed small slots where the turnout tiebars were situated. This was so that I could utilise the small hole in the Peco tiebars for operation. At this stage I decided to use, for the first time, point motors to throw the tiebars. A small bit of research showed that Gaugemaster Seep point motors, PM1, contain contacts to change the polarity of the common crossing (frog). I ordered the four motors required and set about laying the track.
The sleepers of the Peco turnouts are much thicker than the C&L sleepers on the plain track. To arrive at a situation where the rail height is the same for plain track and turnouts, I pinned the turnouts directly to the baseboard surface and fixed the plain track to a card track bed previously glued to the baseboard. The two sidings on the length of white card in the picture above will form the fiddle-yard.
Terry