NHY 581

Western Thunderer
So no point me loaning you a loco on the day then, it'll only get stuck again..

Not my fault, Stubbers. It's all those pasties those Cornish locos eat.......

Possibly better lending a saw and file...

If GWR loco then use saw and file on loco. If SR loco then widen the portal.


Agreed although the portly Pannier will fit. The wonderful locomotives of the noble L&SWR will of course fit as will those of the magnificent Midland........


I thank ewe.


Rob
 

Yorkshire Dave

Western Thunderer
Ignore the GW :). If you wanted a small shunting loco then why not have the Midland version of this NS battery loco.
medium_NRM_CT_932662.jpg
 

NHY 581

Western Thunderer
Thanks Dave..............but nope.

One prefers ones models to represent wheezy old steam engines........even if in reality they are powered by an electric motor in the boiler.

These photo's perhaps sum up what I am after.

The 3F and 2P is by HJ Sutters.

The 3F on a goods, though credited to 53A, looks a lot like a Norman Lockett photo.

The 3F shunting is one of mine, taken by Norman Lockhart at Sheep Lane.


This I hope illustrates what I am after with Bleat Wharf.


Rob.
post-14351-0-77031000-1490643632.jpg
23441485495_2d96083913_b.jpg
20190217_052558.jpg
 

simond

Western Thunderer
Of course.

One thing that became readily apparent is that 4F chimney/cab ventilator/scenic section orifice clearance is that of a gnat's todger.

Rob

Sounds like a successful outcome.

Unless you’re getting picky, clearances maybe divided into three categories. “Loads”, “Enough”, and “None”

The latter may be subdivided into “tight”, “ruddy tight”, “get a bigger hammer”, and “no”.

From what you say, it looks like you’re in the “Enough” area.

Loving the photos...

Best
Simon
 

NHY 581

Western Thunderer
Oops. ....More clearance tests this morning.

No issues with this little beauty.

Little known fact. Highbridge shed retained a half-cab as well as a full cab 1F for use on the Bleat Wharf extension. This was despite upgrading the track work and the one bridge in the 1930s to allow the use of heavier motive power such as 3F and 4F tender locos.


Rob.
 

NHY 581

Western Thunderer
Have to say, I do like those 3F locos...

If you mean the half cab jobbie, it's a 1F, Stubbers. More dainty than a 3F and quite a bit smaller, finer even.

So much nicer than those offensive Panniers.

I know what ewe mean. They can look a bit smug from certain angles. And let's not forget the part they played in the downfall of the S&D..........that's it. I'm off on one now...........Where's me Jinty?

I do feel that is a little harsh, each has their merits and served their region without fame or glory.

Duck was quite famous.......but again he could look smug at times........a bit smirky........almost mocking..........


Rob
 

Stubby47

Western Thunderer
No, my fingers aren't that fat, I did indeed mean the 3F, a compact little tender engine.

The 1F looks too haughty, with the over tall chimney and spectacles like a price-nez.
 

NHY 581

Western Thunderer
No, my fingers aren't that fat, I did indeed mean the 3F, a compact little tender engine.

The 1F looks too haughty, with the over tall chimney and spectacles like a price-nez.

Just checking. I agree. The 3F or Bulldog as we say hereabouts is much nicer than the 4F.

The dear little 1F is not haughty. It's Victorian. They all looked like that, even those Gurt Western in gins.

Rob
 

Jordan

Mid-Western Thunderer
I'm going to post pics of my Pannier Tanks on here, just to annoy people..... :drool::D:D:D

Already through Exit - sprinting across playground... :p
 

Captain Kernow

Western Thunderer
No issues with this little beauty.

Little known fact. Highbridge shed retained a half-cab as well as a full cab 1F for use on the Bleat Wharf extension. This was despite upgrading the track work and the one bridge in the 1930s to allow the use of heavier motive power such as 3F and 4F tender locos.
Pure class, matey.
 
Top